WE HAVE MOVED! If you are joining us, please join us at our new home, The Coil, over on Medium.

If you have arrived at a broken link, please go to The Coil and start your search over.



Showing posts with label Al Kratz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Al Kratz. Show all posts

12.31.2015


Best Books of 2015: Alternating Current Staff Picks
FICTION REVIEWER: AL KRATZ

My “To Be Read” list is usually a few years behind, so I still have several 2015 books that I’m looking forward to reading, but these six stood out as my favorite releases of the year:

I have to go with a fellow Iowan writer for my first pick of the year. Descent, by Tim Johnston, is an exhilarating literary suspense novel about a family on vacation in Colorado, where their teenaged daughter is kidnapped while jogging with her younger brother. The novel covers the impact on all four members of the family and unwinds the mystery into an unpredictable, but perfectly logical, ending.

10.21.2015




Pitfall
CAMERON BANE

Fiction  |  Novel
332 pages
5½” x 8½” perfect-bound trade paperback
ISBN: 978-1942266198
First Edition
WildBlue Press
Evergreen, Colorado
Available HERE
$14.99
Review by Al Kratz

From the first sentence of Pitfall by Cameron Bane, you know what you are in for: a page-turning, suspenseful, literary equivalent of a movie like Taken or Die Hard. “With a shriek of tortured metal, another bullet slashed by my face, tumbling, end for end, by the sound. Ricochet.” Pitfall isn’t a book of internal conflict—this is pure hero’s journey, straight into the lair, the moment of survival, the fight of good vs. evil. The first chapter begins with the hero in an impossible situation, trapped by the bad guy (awesomely named Boneless). Our hero is in a spot like Bruce Willis’ McClane without his shoes, like Liam Neeson’s Mills stuck in Paris with no realistic hope of finding his daughter. As the book takes a breath in the second chapter, we learn the story is being told by a former special-ops military man named John Brenner who will be hired to find a missing college student named Sarah. The enemy he finds is like no other I’ve read in books or seen in movies. It took me a week to read it, but only because I was on a personal non-heroic journey of getting my house ready for sale. Had this been a normal reading weekend, it would have been the kind of book I canceled plans for on Saturday, and then if necessary, did the same to finish reading it on Sunday.

Brenner is a unique character. He’s a former military man who led a group through a difficult and ultimately unsuccessful mission in Iraq. He has lost a wife, son, and daughter on the way. He is machismo, but he is an avid reader, a lover of movies and rare jazz and blues. He is a Renaissance man.

He is a realistic character but also a voice that takes a little getting used to. He likes his conventional similes and extreme metaphors. Brenner tells us of people who sound “as desolate as the back side of the moon.” A place is described as “busier than a fiddler’s convention.” A character he is interviewing has “sweat beading up and popping on his forehead like oil drops on a hot driveway.” Brenner concludes this man is “nervous as a whore in church.” When he talks about his love of classical music, he admits that “sometimes a hilljack can fool you with what he knows.” After a while, these sayings become classic Brenner sayings. I looked forward to them. I understood this was how Brenner related to things in the face of his impossible conflict. This was how he moved through the world. There is nothing unreal here. It may not be what I’m used to in traditional literary stories, but it surely is how a man like Brenner would tell his story. And above all of this, that story drives it all. We want Brenner to succeed. We want to find out what has happened to Sarah. We want good to win.

One of my favorites of the Brenner sayings had a funny echo of the recent Democratic debate where Martin O’Malley delivered a zinger, calling Donald Trump a carnival barker. “I’d just entered a dark carnival on a far bleak shore, and the mad barker had strapped me in for one hell of a ride.” Brenner is in a different carnival than a presidential election, but it shows how common, yet effective, these types of metaphors are.

Act two and three of the book are very effective. The true mystery that Brenner is facing is slowly and naturally revealed. The ending has a good combination of the unexpected and the realistic. There are no moments of tidy wrap-up—It all has a very organic flow. Even Brenner, himself, begins to change naturally. The way he describes things becomes smoother. The clipart comparisons are gone, replaced by ones more from the heart, more unique. He becomes more poetic at the end of his hero’s journey. Still, it’s the John Brenner way: “The slick dusted off, its noise like a million spoons rattling inside a thousand metal drums.” In a moment of peace, he sits outside describing that the “sky overhead was a ridiculously deep blue, graced with high, wispy clouds that looked for all the world like pulled-apart cotton candy.” I wondered if this smoother quality of Brenner was because Brenner was used to his journey and telling his story to the reader or whether Mr. Bane was used to the character and to writing him for us. Did Bane change Brenner or did Brenner change Bane? I suspect it was a bit of both? Either way is a nice effect of art and an enjoyable experience for the reader.

The story is not all external conflict. Just the choice to tell it from the first-person perspective showed Bane was interested in more from Brenner’s story. It makes the story robust. We never know what Liam’s character in Taken is thinking. We just know he is a badass that no one should mess with. We know Die Hard’s McClane can deliver a one-liner, but we get to know many of the internals of John Brenner. Even though his fight is center ring, the side rings don’t stay dark. We know his pain, his doubts, and his motivations. The last two books I read were extremely inner-conflict driven: Harry Crews’ All We Need of Hell and Amy Rowland’s The Transcriptionist. They are great companions to this read. It’s more enjoyable to combine these contrasting main character archetypes: the masculine, the feminine, the existential, and the pragmatic. There is room for them all and literature reaches its high watermarks only when this type of variety is explored.

The story makes another break from the traditional hero’s journey at the ending. It should be no spoiler to suggest our hero makes it out of the lair. His safety in the end is even more obvious when the story is in the hero’s first-person voice, but it takes another nice turn, by not just wrapping everything up tidy and then exiting. The pace throughout most parts of the story is very quick. Chapters are fairly short and often end with a little zinger, a taste of the rising stakes, and an appetizer for the next chapter advancing the action. But as our hero comes out of the lair, as he brings it all home, the pace changes. The last couple chapters are longer. They move slower. They bring you to a deserved ending, but they still have a few tricks up their sleeves.


GIVEAWAY FROM WILDBLUE PRESS!
PITFALL: First in the Suspense Thriller Series By Cameron Bane, featuring former Army Ranger and cop, John Brenner:

WildBlue Press is offering a free 8GB, 7” Kindle Fire when you write the most helpful review on the Amazon sales page or the review with the most likes on the Goodreads page, whichever has the most votes before November 22nd.

After your review is posted, please email the date, site, and a link to it to: info [at] wildbluepress [dot] com.






Al Kratz is our Fiction Reviewer for The Volt. He is a writer from Des Moines, Iowa, an Assistant Fiction Editor at Pithead Chapel, and is currently working on a novel and a short story collection. He has had work featured in Red Savina Review, Wyvern Lit, Flash Flood, Daily Palette, Apeiron Review, Ardor Flash Fiction, 1000words, Gravel, Literary Orphans, and elsewhere, and he is the winner of the 2013 British Fantasy Society Flash Fiction Competition.

• This book was submitted by the publicist to Alternating Current for a book blog tour. The reviewer does not know the author or publicist and received the book from Alternating Current at random. • Permalink • Tag: The Volt •

10.06.2015


Reckoning
RUSTY BARNES

Fiction  |  Novel
239 pages
5” x 7” perfect-bound trade paperback
ISBN: 978-1-934513-45-3
First Edition
Sunnyoutside
Buffalo, New York
Available HERE
$16.00
Review by Al Kratz

While I was reading Reckoning, by Rusty Barnes, I had a repetitive thought: There are a lot of really good small press books! This thought wasn’t necessarily a discovery. Since you have come to a small press blog to read a small press book review, it’s likely not shocking to you, either, but I think it bears repeating. There are a lot of really good small press books! Along with this idea, I’m struck by how easy it would be to miss reading a book like Reckoning if I limited my reading selection to Amazon recommendations or to reviews coming out of New York. I reckon this gives the indie reader an additional duty. The indie book thrives on the word of mouth, the Goodreads review, the Twitter mentions—the buzz. It’s a little extra effort, but the reader’s return on investment is a stronger network and a decreased chance that we’ll miss good books.

Reckoning is a good book that I’m glad I didn’t miss. It’s a tense coming-of-age story about a 14-year-old boy named Richard Logan who lives in a small, rural, Appalachian town. It begins with Richard in his typical world: working on a farm bringing in hay, dealing with the expectations of his father, and spending time with friends. His typical world quickly changes when his friends and he find an unconscious woman in the woods. This woman, Misty, turns out to be friends with the mother of Richard’s friend, Katie. The story is about them helping Misty, which leads to them having to deal with the villain, Lyle, the sociopathic son of the farmer who hired Richard.

Barnes delivers the story in a matter-of-fact style that lets the action speak for itself. He builds a world that is harsh and relentless, and the reader is compelled to understand it and to find out what will happen to Richard. The evil in his world is often hinted and out of reach. He could let it go, but he’s drawn to addressing it. He chases it and, most of the time, misses it until it occasionally appears and slaps him around. The writing is reminiscent of Daniel Woodrell classics such as Winter’s Bone or Give Us a Kiss: A Country Noir. They all create rural, criminal worlds that are dangerous to the innocent, just via their proximity. Knowing what the criminals are doing in the shadows is enough to get you in trouble. Reckoning establishes its noir with a little more subtlety than Woodrell’s work. Barnes doesn’t need to label it, or use it for shock value—he lets his world unfold more naturally. It’s not until resolution of the main conflict that the full nature of what’s going on in this world is known. The reader learns along with Richard.

The coming-of-age portion of the story contains the classic issues for a growing boy: sexuality, masculinity, freedom, and morality all challenge the protagonist. Like the classic Bowie song, “Changes,” Richard is quite aware of what he’s going through. When Katie says her ex-boyfriend doesn’t fit in in the town as well as Richard does, he shares his perspective on why:

That’s the way things work. Everyone else tells you your place in the world, and you agree with it or not, and that’s how a life gets built. On what somebody else thinks of you.
(p. 80)

Like most teenagers, he makes mistakes, some of which are cringeworthy. Richard is drawn to the older woman, Misty, and he is confused about his feelings for Katie. He is both attracted to and repelled from her, mostly because he doesn’t understand either feeling. He doesn’t like this position, and he resigns to the fact that the only way to get to understanding is to grow up.

Being immature physically also presents challenges in his interactions with men. He’s in the awkward in-between age, and it limits him from helping his father with certain types of manual labor, and it limits his ability to handle physical confrontations with Lyle. He wants to run away from these challenges; he wants to be free, but his sense of justice draws him to find closure regardless of what it might cost him.

He knew dogs could go bad. Humans could, even more easily, and Richard wondered if he had it in him to go bad. He thought of Lyle’s breath in his face and the ache in his right arm. Misty and Kate and Mrs. Neary flashed into his head, and he thought maybe he could do it. He just needed to figure out how.
(p. 108)

These coming-of-age issues converge as the plot takes the group to a resolution of finding out what Lyle is doing. A now-more-mature 14-year-old is ready to complete his journey.

He was just a kid, but he deserved to have a chance to get back at Lyle, to make it better in his head. It wasn’t revenge. It was doing what needed to be done. It was everything he’d been taught in school and by his father and by all the men in the world who truly cared what kind of person he would become.
(p. 199)

This convergence leads to a reckoning for Lyle and Richard who are each called to account for the impacts of their actions. Richard has to face what he has done during his push to stop Lyle. What it has cost the people around him. This impact on Richard gives the story its strength, takes it beyond noir, and makes it an indie read easy to recommend.




Al Kratz is our Fiction Reviewer for The Volt. He is a writer from Des Moines, Iowa, an Assistant Fiction Editor at Pithead Chapel, and is currently working on a novel and a short story collection. He has had work featured in Red Savina Review, Wyvern Lit, Flash Flood, Daily Palette, Apeiron Review, Ardor Flash Fiction, 1000words, Gravel, Literary Orphans, and elsewhere, and he is the winner of the 2013 British Fantasy Society Flash Fiction Competition.

• This book was purchased by Alternating Current from the author at an AWP event. The reviewer does not know the author and received the book from Alternating Current at random. • Permalink • Tag: The Volt •

9.17.2015


Not on Fire, Only Dying
SUSAN RUKEYSER

Fiction  |  Novel
280 Pages
5½” x 8½” Trade Paperback
ISBN 978-1-940189-10-9
First Edition
Review Copy: PDF ARC
Twisted Road Publications
Tallahassee, Florida, USA
Available HERE
$17.00
Review by Al Kratz

In the opening of Susan Rukeyser’s debut novel, Not on Fire, Only Dying, high stakes are established when a woman reports her baby is missing. As the scene develops, it becomes clear there is more to everyone’s story. Lola, the mother reporting the incident, is very troubled, and the people she’s come to for help don’t even know she had a baby. Everyone has to face the possibility that it’s another one of her delusions. The only thing they are completely sure of is they want to help her.

The police are skeptical. They judge her on the surface stereotypes that are on the minds of her friends. Her biggest supporter is Marko, a drug dealing ex-con of Romani descent. For the most part, Marko becomes the driving character of the novel and the heartbeat of this unique and gritty story. He is dedicated to Lola and loyal to Mary, the owner of a salvage store where Lola first comes in for help. It’s shown early in the story that if he’s a man who has to protect, he might also be a man who has to attack.

His legs come scissoring out of a full-length oilskin duster. Black coattails sail out behind. Marko knows that when he moves, he becomes something dark and sharply angled. The decades have carved shadows behind his eyes and beneath his cheekbones. His brow is a frenzy of lines. He is frightening, maybe to the delicate.
(p. 12).


The quick and concise detail of that last sentence is a good sample of how this story is so effectively told. It’s never forced. There always is a confident ease to its flow. Susan Rukeyser obviously knew how she had to tell this story.

Most of the action takes place in the shabby Hudson Valley town of Schendenkill. Before the day of the incident, Lola had only recently been back from living in New York City. This explains the group being unsure of her status as a new mother, but it also provides a place for Marko’s quest. Lola says the father of the baby is a man in New York City, named Daniel. Marco becomes obsessed with him, not out of jealousy, but by the motive of learning more about what has happened with Lola.

Mary becomes a good friend of Marko’s and draws out some of his past. This is the only time that the book dives into backstory when Marko tells her the specifics of his criminal history and spends some time remembering his Romani upbringing. This shows what has centered Marco as an outsider and is highlighted by this memory:

His mother replied, “Outsiders are tolerated here, sure. And, yes, that is much better than persecution. But it’s not the same as belonging.”
(p. 82).


Mary also serves as a measure of how far people are willing to go with Lola’s story and when they need to give up on it. Her salvage business is appropriate subtext for their lives as old junk no one else wants to save or to buy.

Marko and Lola have a Sid-and-Nancy quality. It seems they are capable of any type of failure and spend most of their lives on the extremes. At times, they are the kind of magnets that repel, while other times they are the ones that attract. The title, which comes from an expression people used to describe a scenic trail in the Hudson Valley:

Hiking alone is discouraged. Someone must be nearby in case you swoon. Someone must remind you that the land you are on is not on fire, only dying. Gently as it’s meant to.”
(p. 35),


also summarizes the connection between these two characters. They are nearby for each other when they swoon. They remind each other what is real and what is not. With all of these tasks, they have variable rates of success. With this story, the reverse phrase could also be in play: Not dying, only on fire.

Throughout their struggles, they aren’t always sympathetic characters, but they certainly are compelling. When Lola reports her baby missing, she is very upfront with including the detail that she had left him in a stroller outside a bar. Marko considers Lola “his girl” even though, at first, it seems Lola hardly knows him. I think the author makes them compelling not only by not hiding their weaknesses, but also by not overstating them or making a writerly show of being edgy. The characters just are what they are. Lola is very self-aware of the problem she presents:

Better to call them: Let’s Hope, Why Not, If It Shuts You Up. I tell you, Marko, no pill dissolves faster than a doctor’s interest when there are no signs of improvement. I never stabilized. I’m a disappointment at best.
(p. 75).


Readers end up facing the same dilemma that Marko and Mary do. We can forgive Lola if she did leave a baby outside the bar because, regardless of the validity of her story, it’s clear she needs help. Once we get past her doing what none of us would do to our babies, two situations are possible: She is making her baby up, or her baby has been kidnapped. Either one is a case of her needing serious help. The suspense is guaranteed, but the lengths to which Marko goes to help Lola also makes for a sweet and compelling love story. It’s about intimacy against almost impossible odds:

Nighttime, finally, and once again Lola lies in his arms, as if this isn’t extraordinary, as if he never doubted he’d hold her again, as if she was never lost to him, a stranger sneering at his affection. They’re fully clothed, and Marko doesn’t care if that never changes. It’s enough, having her settled back against him, not poised to flee.
(p. 92).


Marko continues his search for the truth into winter. He navigates doubts, his own bendable moral codes, and his precarious love for Lola. Getting there is a suspenseful page-turner that earns its ending. As it starts its descent to the final act, Lola and Marko have a fitting exchange about endings:

“People like happy endings,” she says, returning to her work.
“Not all people,” he insists. “Some of us just want real ones.”
(p. 183).





Al Kratz is our Fiction Reviewer for The Volt. He is a writer from Des Moines, Iowa, an Assistant Fiction Editor at Pithead Chapel, and is currently working on a novel and a short story collection. He has had work featured in Red Savina Review, Wyvern Lit, Flash Flood, Daily Palette, Apeiron Review, Ardor Flash Fiction, 1000words, Gravel, Literary Orphans, and elsewhere, and he is the winner of the 2013 British Fantasy Society Flash Fiction Competition.
• This book was submitted to the reviewer by the author at the reviewer’s request. The reviewer has had brief interactions with the author on social media, but does not know the author or the publisher personally. • Permalink • Tag: The Volt •

8.06.2015


The New York Stories
BEN TANZER

Fiction  |  Three Volumes in One Collection
224 pages
5 ½” x 8 ½” Trade Paperback
ISBN 978-1-939987-33-4
First Edition
Review Copy: Paperback ARC
Chicago Center for Literature and Photography
Chicago, Illinois
Available HERE
$14.99
Review by Al Kratz

At an AWP Offsite Event sponsored by Alternating Current and Lockjaw Magazine, I was given two books to read and review: Sara Lippmann’s Doll Palace and Ben Tanzer’s The New York Stories. They are both excellent demonstrations of the art of the short story and strong arguments that the form is alive and well. In my review of Doll Palace, I suggested that Lippmann’s themes were similar to Richard Yates. Now, a parallel idea for Tanzer would be his similarity to Raymond Carver. I don’t think it’s too big of a stretch to argue that in many ways Tanzer and Lippmann often meet or exceed the high standards set by their influences.

The New York Stories is a collection of collections, three volumes in one: Repetition Patterns from 2008, So Different Now from 2011, and After the Flood from 2014. These volumes are another fine example of the whole being greater than the sum of its parts. It’s hard for me to imagine any of the volumes as stand-alone because they are so integrated and complete such a deep arc. Each volume is also arguably great examples of the novella-in-flash form defined and sampled in Rose Metal Press’s My Very End of the Universe. Tanzer’s full collection gets a little more space to complete its task than the narrow focus of a novella, but it’s a good representation of the strength of connected short pieces and the large impact that brevity can produce.

The stories take place in a fictional upstate New York town called Two Rivers and center around a small group of common characters and families. They look at realistic issues, such as coming of age, marital infidelity, alcohol abuse, and parenting, from all angles. Some of the stories are “sneaky” dark, where the characters are doing normal day-to-day things, but events turn more serious when adults have inappropriate contact with minors or find out one of their friends has been physically abusive to his girlfriend.

The timeline of the collection follows the aging of the children from volume to volume. These kids grow up with dysfunctional parents and, in the second volume, become dysfunctional themselves. By the third volume, just before all the pieces of their lives fall, a flood comes into Two Rivers that threatens to destroy anything they have left. During the early parts of the second volume, this reader started to feel like an experienced Two Rivers observer. I “got” these people. I felt Tanzer gain momentum with this world. By the third volume, when the rains come down, all bets are off. The stakes in their personal lives are as extreme as the weather. He doesn’t just put his characters up a tree and throw a few rocks at them—these trees are underwater. These trees lose their roots. These rocks are mountain-sized. These pages are intense.

This part of the book contains some wonderful Noah’s Ark imagery. Little by little, quick and minimally, they are introduced in the various flood stories:

Why are animals crossing the road two at a time though? I do not know, but they are, heading up the mountain to whatever something awaits them there.
(“Barely Breathing,” p. 139)


As I kneel there, the hammer slipping with every strike of a nail, two deer, a buck and a doe, walk out of the woods on the outskirts of the cemetery. They are followed by two skunks, and then a pair of raccoons, all of whom dutifully line up a small distance from the platform. I don’t make eye contact with them or treat their presence as anything but normal.
(“Vision,” p. 171).

Consistent with the almost sadistic (in a good, positive literary context, of course) treatment of his characters I mentioned above, Noah is just a tease. Safety (redemption?) remains an illusion. Just out of reach. Dreamy. Impossible. There will be no ark built in Two Rivers. These guys are on their own and good luck.

There is a unique dynamic, particularly in the first volume, where the stories are often told in first-person by a specific Two Rivers resident; yet, this narrator has omnipotent knowledge of the other characters’ experiences and points of view. I don’t believe this is sloppy writing or anything for the POV Police to point out in a workshop. I think this was serving specific roles within the themes Tanzer wanted to explore. There is a shared story that happens with small neighborhoods, sometimes spread through the rumor mill and other times spread through small-town intimacy, proximity. We end up knowing more of the characters’ stories than maybe we should. Or at least we think we know them. This construct even becomes an explicit theme in a story called, “What We Thought We Knew,” which takes the reader through events with a student and a teacher. As the story evolves, the strength of the rumor mill is evaluated. In the end:

What we thought we knew wasn’t very important, because the fact was that we didn’t know shit, and you never do.
(p. 32).

In this case, the narrator could be viewed as unreliable. Not everything he “knows” about the other characters might be completely true, but it’s still important that it comes from a first-person perspective in Two Rivers. That is who can tell the town’s story, regardless of whether it’s real omnipotence or the appearance of omnipotence.

A second effective dynamic in The New York Stories is the usage of time, which functions as a multifaceted motif throughout the book. On the surface, the volumes cover one steady, long timeline. It’s not explicitly mentioned, but landmarks in the stories make me think it starts in the late seventies/early eighties and ends somewhere in the aughts. In the introduction, Tanzer thanks the filmmaker Richard Linklater and his Before trilogy, which spanned the early adulthood to middle-age stages of its main characters. In some ways, The New York Stories reminds me more of the literary equivalent of Linklater’s Boyhood, actually filmed over that type of time passage. It seems both have in common a rewarded leap of faith that the eventual collection of timed pieces would come together.

On another level, Tanzer uses time very effectively within each story. The full timeline of the book is in play and interchangeable in each story without ever feeling like a gratuitous dive into a flashback. Pieces are connected to each other through this subtle time exchange, a brief mention of who cheated on whom, or who can’t handle his Yuengling is all it takes.

One of the stories is called, “What We Talk about When We Talk about the Flood,” a direct homage to the great “What We Talk about When We Talk about Love,” by Raymond Carver. Tanzer’s is a quick three-pager that doesn’t intend to answer or to cover the ground of Carver’s, but in staying small, it accomplishes a lot. Carver dives into the elusive meaning of love via layered and complicated scenarios including an abusive spouse and characters on their second or third marriage questioning the permanence of love. Carver exits with this line:

I could hear my heart beating. I could hear everyone’s heart. I could hear the human noise we sat there making, not one of us moving, not even when the room went dark.
(Raymond Carver, “What We Talk about When We Talk about Love,” Vantage Book Edition, 1989, p. 154).

Tanzer’s characters are gathered in a similar social situation: a pair of couples toward the end of a longish drinking session. He intentionally keeps them from the layers Carver builds. The flood is too dominant. They talk less. They drink more.

And when we drink to love as the rain plasters our hair to our foreheads, the flood waters rise, and we slowly float away.
(p. 176)

I think Carver would appreciate the silence.

Alright, AWP 2016: The bar has been set high by Lippman and Tanzer. I can’t wait to read you.




Al Kratz is our Fiction Reviewer for The Volt. He is a writer from Des Moines, Iowa, an Assistant Fiction Editor at Pithead Chapel, and is currently working on a novel and a short story collection. He has had work featured in Red Savina Review, Wyvern Lit, Flash Flood, Daily Palette, Apeiron Review, Ardor Flash Fiction, 1000words, Gravel, Literary Orphans, and elsewhere, and he is the winner of the 2013 British Fantasy Society Flash Fiction Competition.

• An ARC of this book was given to Alternating Current by the author at an author reading event where the author met Alternating Current staffers. The reviewer met the author briefly and expressed interest in reviewing the book. • Permalink • Tag: The Volt •

7.16.2015


All This Life
JOSHUA MOHR

Fiction  |  Novel
304 pages
6” x 9” Hardcover
ISBN 978-1593766030
First Edition
Review Copy: Kindle Mobi ARC
Soft Skull Press
Brooklyn, New York
Available HERE
$25.00
Review by Al Kratz

All This Life by Joshua Mohr kicks off with a typical setting of an angry teenager and his middle-aged-crisis-fighting father stuck in traffic on the Golden Gate Bridge. By the end of the first chapter, and the end of the lives of a group of bridge jumpers, it’s clear all of this life isn’t going to be typical—it’s going to be complex and heartbreaking.

The 14-year-old boy, Jake, video records a band of musicians walking on the bridge because it’s the only thing for him to do in the bumper-to-bumper malaise. His father, Paul, spaces off to fantasy football daydreams. The mundane ends when, one by one, the band members jump off the bridge. Jake records it all and begins a series of events that will throw a wide set of characters into an unforgettable journey and an inevitable, but well-crafted, convergence.

We also meet Sara and Rodney from a small Nevada desert town. Rodney, a.k.a. Balloon Boy, was a teen who ended up in a stunt ride in a weather balloon that spit him out fifty feet in the air and left him forever a slow speaker with fast and valid thoughts stuck inside his lucky-to-be-alive head. Sara had been his girlfriend at the time of the accident. She later becomes the victim of a different boyfriend sending her sex tape viral, which leads to Sara and Rodney making an escape road trip to look for Rodney’s mother, Kat, who had turned to alcohol after her son’s accident and had run away from him to live in San Francisco.

This may seem like a long list of characters, and I’m not done summarizing them yet. It was the type of book where I wrote down the names and backgrounds of the characters as I went on so I could keep them straight. They are so developed that, by the climax, putting them down feels like watching a large cast of a play come out for curtain call. They seem like friends at that point, to be appreciated and missed after the exit.

There also is a character simply referred to as Noah911. The central themes of the book revolve around us losing our personal identities to our social-media-online-selves. Noah911 is the older brother of one of the bridge jumpers. He’s dealing with the guilt of not knowing what she was headed for. He’s dealing with the pain of seeing Jake’s video of the jump go viral.

Jake’s mom, Kat, is a recovering alcoholic who spends some time with her sponsor and only friend, Deb, a bold tattoo artist. The final main character is Kat’s Craigslist roommate, Wes. Wes is an eccentric scientist of sorts, with unique theories in existential math and a longing to bring back the spirit of Albert Einstein to save the world from its path of disillusionment and unhappiness.

Mohr takes a couple of risks with this cast of characters but manages to get them to work. First, with so many concurrent stories going on, and switching between several characters’ points of view, he risks that the reader won’t like the jumping. The reader may not like some of the characters or their stories as much as others. Yet, the chapters were fairly short, and the plot was in constant movement, so getting back to that favorite character wasn’t ever a long wait. Each time I thought the multiple branches were going to be a problem for me, the sub-story took the right twist to keep it as compelling as the others.

A second risk was that, to explore the themes of the new disillusionment, Mohr had to spend a lot of time inside the characters’ heads. This included nice moments where his characters were escaping their conflicts, like the flashback of Rodney’s escape in the balloon, appreciating the view before the accident:

This must have been what it was like when they realized the earth was round, not flat—to understand that there were no edges to fall from, no end of the world. It would spin and spin forever, and they were all so lucky to be here. Rodney for the first time felt a great appetite to experience life outside of Traurig... All he craved was flight.
(Loc 1484)

A similar moment occurred for Sara when her brother is helping her deal with the news that her sex tape had exploded on the Internet. He’s helping her use her imagination to escape, pretending the broken down pool they are in is still thriving:

Sara can’t get in the pool fast enough, tearing toward it and leaping in. There are a couple inches or so of dust and sand at the bottom. The walls are cracked and puckered. But right now Sara doesn’t see any of that. All she sees is the water and her brother and her parents sitting in chairs on the side, watching them swim.
(Loc 1432)

Sometimes these inner conflicts are explored through beautiful images.

The funeral was a fist. It had tear ducts. The funeral was held in a lung, clammy and loud with mourners plucking clumsy ballads on heartstrings and razor wire. Grief felt tight to the body, like a wetsuit, squeezing Noah911’s anatomy into a tangle of pall and regret.
(Loc 3387)

There were moments when this wasn’t as strong as the external scenes, wasn’t done with imagery, but with the explicit thought that felt more like being in the author’s head than in the character’s. This was particularly true in the Jake and Paul plot line. Sometimes Paul’s thoughts seemed to be more an exposition on the Internet themes than the natural outcome of the problem.

It’s like everything is dammed up behind a wall of worry. Fear, concern for his son. For his whole generation, really. Their crass way of publicizing everything.
(Loc 2023)

Other times, these thoughts were good at capturing the midlife-crisis anxiety:

It all makes Paul feel so old. So irrelevant. He’s sexually irrelevant and emotionally irrelevant and socially irrelevant, and if he keeps pretending that certain advancements in the workplace don’t exist he’ll soon be occupationally irrelevant, and in a few years Jake will go off to college and his wife’s already gone, so Paul will be left familially irrelevant, and that will be the end result of his life.
(Loc 2038)

Mohr paints a vivid picture of the Internet age. How the connected world is more unconnected than ever. How our brains have become tricked-up by over-stimuli. How organic and ridiculous viral events are. My favorite part of his characters’ struggles, though, is how many of these conflicts were as valid in 1950 as they are in 2015. Maybe Sara’s sex tape couldn’t have existed in that era, but sex shaming is certainly not a new social phenomenon. The challenge of happiness and connection isn’t the new problem it sometimes feels like—it’s the same old human problem we’ve always had. That is simultaneously reassuring and scary as hell, and prevalent in Mohr’s book.

One of the sadder story lines was Noah911’s dealing with his self-applied guilt over his sister’s death. He responds by disconnecting. It’s not the viral video of his sister’s suicide that disconnects him. It’s his personal psychological retreat. It reminded me of Into the Wild and the Christopher McCandless story. Every time McCandless had a family, either actual relatives or “his” people he encountered on the road, he pushed them away. It’s not the outside world that does that. It’s the individual. It was Noah911.

My favorite part of the read was feeling the book gain momentum about three-quarters of the way through. By the time the characters were fully established, well on their various journeys, a surprising thing happened: the book moved from a fun cerebral dive into a riveting and urgent suspense story. The result was a pleasing and deserved end, an enjoyable but heartbreaking read, and a memorable story.




Al Kratz is our Fiction Reviewer for The Volt. He is a writer from Des Moines, Iowa, an Assistant Fiction Editor at Pithead Chapel, and is currently working on a novel and a short story collection. He has had work featured in Red Savina Review, Wyvern Lit, Flash Flood, Daily Palette, Apeiron Review, Ardor Flash Fiction, 1000words, Gravel, Literary Orphans, and elsewhere, and he is the winner of the 2013 British Fantasy Society Flash Fiction Competition.

• This book was submitted to Alternating Current by the author. The reviewer does not know the author or the publisher and received the book from Alternating Current at random. • Permalink • Tag: The Volt •

6.11.2015


Making Nice
MATT SUMELL

Fiction  |  Stories
240 pages
5.8” x 8½” Hardcover
ISBN 9781627790932
First Edition
Henry Holt and Co.
New York, New York
Available HERE
$25.00
Review by Al Kratz

I first heard about Matt Sumell when I read his story, “All Lateral,” in One Story, issue #201. One Story has a wide range of great stories, but for the most part, they aren’t humorous. (“Fear Itself,” #192, Katie Coyle’s story about a girl’s relationship at a museum with a wax figurine of FDR is another awesome exception to this.) But “All Lateral,” and its main character, Alby, had me laughing on every page, and it all ended too soon. I wanted more. So, I was happy when I saw his name on the list of One Story 2015 Debutantes: authors published in One Story who had debut books in the past year. I was even happier when I heard his book, Making Nice, was a collection of Alby stories, including “All Lateral.”

What you need to know about Making Nice: It’s well written, and it’s hilarious. Well, I think it’s hilarious. When it comes to Alby, there will be two kinds of people. Some might think he is a funny anti-heroic character worth taking for a 225-page ride. Others might think he is an offensive pig who shouldn’t be humored—it will only make guys like him worse. I’m ready to stand tall and trumpet the call of the first group. I know I’m not alone because a friend of mine told me about reading these stories out loud to her husband on a road trip where they cry-laughed for 170 miles.

At its core, Making Nice is the story of a 30-year-old man named Albert, who goes by the nickname Alby. The book is 20 connected, first-person stories, dealing with the death of his mother, his relationships with his brother and sister, and their father.

At Alby’s core, he is the kind of guy who tells his sister lovingly to shut the fuck up. He punches babies, but only when he was a toddler, and as an adult he only thinks about punching them; he doesn’t actually do it. He is honest, regardless of the damage it does to himself or to the people he loves. This is made clear from the opening sentence to the book:

Thing is she didn’t think that pots and pans should go in the dishwasher, so I pointed out that there’s a setting on the dishwasher for pots and pans, just look, it’s right there, open your fuckin’ eyeballs.
(“Punching Jackie,” p. 1).

The humor and the self-aware reflection give it its quality. He’s not unabashed. He’s right there with the reader and our I Can’t Believe He Did That and our What Is His Problem? In this opening exchange with his sister, he reflects on their ability to go in for the kill, to find out what buttons hurt the most:

[...] I’d be lying if I said I haven’t done the same thing myself in arguments past. Just the other night even this girl in a bar was not nice to my nice friend James so I said, “Wow, that’s ugly.” When she said, “What is?” I said, “Your face. Now get outta here.” It wasn’t true, but I was pretty sure it would hurt her feelings, and as it turned out I was correct.
(p. 1).

This life has its rules. In “Their Appointed Rounds,” he finds a fellow bar patron named Donny on the ground out in the parking lot. He hasn’t been friends with Donny since elementary, when Donny punched him in the side of the head during a math test, but in the rules of this life, you help a man when he is down like this. But this is the type of help you give:

I kicked him harder the second time, and without looking, he felt around with his left hand, discovered my right shoe, patted around the laces, and untied the knot. I found it strangely endearing, his refusal to behave in spite of his vulnerability.
(p. 98).

It also has its language, like turning this into a verb: unprotecto-ed. As in:

I unprotecto-ed her best friend after my mother’s funeral [...].
(“Toast,” p. 134).

I find it interesting the common ring that Making Nice has to the title Breaking Bad. Both are great takes on the idea of an anti-hero, unlikable characters, unsympathetic characters. Breaking Bad started with the idea of good gone bad: Mr. Chips turns into a meth dealer. Making Nice came from an expression his mother would say to Alby when she knew he was going to do something extreme, like push his brother off a roof or punch a baby. She would tell him to Make Nice, and he could. He could tame his bad before breaking everything and everyone around him.

I like Walter White. I like Tony Soprano. I like Alby. What does that say about me? I saw an interview with a producer of Good Will Hunting, Chris Moore, who said that character was the first thing he looks for in a story. He wanted someone to root for. Someone he’d hang with. I’d hang with Walter and Alby. (I probably wouldn’t with Tony Soprano. That would be too scary.) I saw a panel at this year’s AWP in Minneapolis called Sympathy for the Devil: Writing “Unlikable” Characters. I noticed even they put the unlikable in quotes, as if admitting that it’s a slippery term. In this panel, they mentioned that the critical quality of any character regardless of likability, is that the character must be compelling.

Getting my defense of Alby ready, I found some interesting definitions of terms from Oxford online:

Sympathetic: 1. feeling, showing, or expressing sympathy. 2. Pleasant or agreeable. Attracting the liking of others.
Sympathy: Understanding between people; common feeling.
Compelling: Evoking interest, attention, or admiration in a powerfully irresistible way.
Compel: Force or oblige someone to do something.

This might not build the case for Alby or any character that isn’t exact to a traditional view of likable. That seems to limit ourselves too much and to stop us from finding beauty. These definitions lead to circular logic that still might speak the best truth: I like the characters I like. This seemed to be a concept that Matt was conscious of throughout the book, and how he got it all to work is genius. All I can say is Alby is funny as hell. If you stick with him, you might enjoy a story about a man trying to learn to live. Trying to overcome loss and defeat. Trying to be understood. Trying to look at life in different perspectives. You just might be embarrassed to like him!




Al Kratz is our Fiction Reviewer for The Volt. He is a writer from Des Moines, Iowa, an Assistant Fiction Editor at Pithead Chapel, and is currently working on a novel and a short story collection. He has had work featured in Red Savina Review, Wyvern Lit, Flash Flood, Daily Palette, Apeiron Review, Ardor Flash Fiction, 1000words, Gravel, Literary Orphans, and elsewhere, and he is the winner of the 2013 British Fantasy Society Flash Fiction Competition.

• This book was received by the reviewer from the author at an AWP event, where the reviewer briefly met the author in-person and expressed interest in reviewing the book. • Permalink • Tag: The Volt •

6.04.2015


Doll Palace
SARA LIPPMANN

Fiction  |  Stories
258 pages
5 ½” x 8” Trade Paperback
ISBN 978-0991065714
First Edition
Review Copy: Paperback
Dock Street Press
Seattle, Washington
Available HERE
$11.00
Review by Al Kratz

Sara Lippmann’s debut, Doll Palace, is a great short story collection of 23 stories told with an incredibly strong and unique voice. These stories are brutally genuine, confessionally harsh without apology, and interested in doing nothing else but allowing the author to take her turn to say this is how it is. This is how it is to be a girl, a young woman, a middle-aged woman, a wife, an ex-wife. What the advance readers say on the back cover isn’t just blurb—her work is raw and unflinching—seriously—I don’t think it’s possible to be any more raw or flinch any less. The preface sums it all up with a haunting quote:

So, come on in
And look about.
You go in a girl,
And you never get out.

Throughout the book, it was a pleasure to see her continually raise the bar. It’s common for there to be at least one lull in a collection, with the best ones stacked up front, but this one continued to get better and better with each page and story.

Most of the stories are in the first-person point of view. That allowed her the chance to mix her personal narrative with the characters’ stark confessions and brutal observations.

Somewhere, it must be written: Tell a little sister she’s hotter than cooler than more badass than her older sister and she will do anything to make it feel true.
(“Whipping Post,” p. 7).

Some of my favorite moments were these knives, these quick-cutting and decisive insights:

Tami has an unbelievable ability to ignore the ugly in others.
(p. 46)
If she knew his sadness makes me forget my own she might reconsider living with me.
(p. 90)
She was always feeling “vaguely suicidal.” Name a woman who feels different.
(p. 115)
Empty is better. Empty is what I know best.
(p.183).

One of the best cuts like these is in the story, “Talisman,” where a man on the street has been calling a woman, “angel.” Three-quarters of the way through the story, the narrator simply states: “I am nobody’s Angel.” Alone, that kind of a line might go unnoticed, but with all of the subtext of the story and the book, it stops you—it demands attention.

There is a lot of this that reminded me of Richard Yates’ voice.

Once he visited a North Philly hooker and wept into her neck, which smelled like movie popcorn, and begged her to clasp her bruised limbs around him. She rolled her eyes but complied, charging twice as much for affection as for sex.
(“The Last Resort,” p. 35).

These themes follow a natural progression of Yates’ on disillusionment and precarious intimacy. It’s like this is how the children of his characters turned out: screwed up just like them.

Sometimes I wish I could be like her, feeling everything at once, the full spectrum right there on the surface. Every kiss, every fender bender, forgotten line in a school play, every insult from our mother, touch from our father, every exhilaration and humiliation, fingers slammed in lockers, stretching me out like a mouse in a trap, all of it.
(“Foreign Bodies,” p. 177).

There is a moment in “The Second Act,” where a group of couples is at a party—the kind that Frank and April Wheeler would have been pressured into attending on Revolutionary Road.

Husbands gaze past their wives with that glassy, half-boner look, only Ben’s jaw, long square and cleft, is more pronounced, as if he is a dehydrated caveman.
(p. 198).

Some of the stories take a nice break from the above patterns. There is “The Last Resort,” which is told from a dad’s point of view while chaperoning his son’s high school trip. The most unique is probably “House Boy,” which is told from the point of view of a 23-year-old former Israeli soldier who, in broken English, tells a poetic story about being the caretaker for a Mr. Strickland. She weaves his language difficulty into pure poetry.

Sometimes there is deer eating the hydrangea bush and sometimes I exclaimate, Die Deer! But sometime I stand there and say, you are my friend, deer, you have eyes like hand grenades, when I vision your blood pulsating true animal vein make me want to be a better man.
(p. 66).

This finishes with an incredibly beautiful line:

The whole world is cry. Water flood her cup, spill her wrist, soften the elbow, I drain in tears, but when she close the tap to breathe I pray maybe she have place inside the deep rise and fall of her lungs for me.
(p. 68).

Sara’s stories often work in ambiguity where major parts exist in the implied. Either through an open-ending like in “Babydollz”:

The whole time her mouth moves I am practically numb. It is not the full story but I can fill in the rest. Girls are girls.
(p.92),

or through an implied introduction to conflict like in “Come See for Yourself”:

Since the doctor last week, I haven’t felt much like anything. It’s early yet my mind is set.
(p. 166).

The power of this can be in the flow, never stopping for “writerly” exposition, but it also risks that a reader, possibly someone from a different perspective, won’t get it. The stories also seem to imply, though, that they don’t care about this risk. I think this might be why I liked it more and more as I went on—maybe as I met her challenge, she was bringing me further into the perspective of Doll Palace? Maybe I’ll never get out?




Al Kratz is our Fiction Reviewer for The Volt. He is a writer from Des Moines, Iowa, an Assistant Fiction Editor at Pithead Chapel, and is currently working on a novel and a short story collection. He has had work featured in Red Savina Review, Wyvern Lit, Flash Flood, Daily Palette, Apeiron Review, Ardor Flash Fiction, 1000words, Gravel, Literary Orphans, and elsewhere, and he is the winner of the 2013 British Fantasy Society Flash Fiction Competition.

• This book was received by the reviewer from the author at an AWP event, where the reviewer briefly met the author in-person and expressed interest in reviewing the book. • Permalink • Tag: The Volt •